Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Where there is no such term, force majeure is governed by Section 56.In Indian law, under Section 56, as held in Satyabrata Ghose v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Where there is no such term, force majeure is governed by Section 56.In Indian law, under Section 56, as held in Satyabrata Ghose v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Alejandro E. Camacho
As noted in the pivotal Supreme Court decision Rapanos v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by The Collins Law Firm, P.C.
It was, and remains, the largest single plaintiff jury verdict in the 150+ year legal history of the State of Illinois. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:54 am
GPS devices planted by the police are already not a Fourth Amendment issue, but state law may be different, as in New York's People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The DEA swooped in one day and destroyed her plants, even though medical marijuana use in California is legal under state law. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
But county officials told the sheriff to suspend the program this year after a case out of Los Angeles -- Pack v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:39 pm by Carl Neff
Background This precise issue was addressed in the recent decision of SolarReserve CSP Holdings LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
The claims were brought against utilities by states complaining that carbon emissions from power plants were contributing to harm from climate change. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
A child of about 3 years of age was pulling plants up from a flower bed and damaging other plants. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state’s highest court relied primarily upon a 2001 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Kyllo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Missouri Public Service Commission 13-787Issue: Whether the filed rate doctrine and Supremacy Clause permit a state public service commission to “trap” federally approved costs with a utility by recognizing the prudency of obtaining electric power from a plant in another state, but then barring the utility from recovering the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission-approved transmission costs of importing that power. [read post]