Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Public Service Commission, which asks, in pertinent part, whether the regulation burdening speech directly advances a substantial government interest, and whether the regulation “is not more extensive than necessary to serve the interest. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Gordon v Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (Scotland), heard 13 December 2016. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:23 am
On the other hand, a contract for services will mainly consist in completing tasks or supplying services for a pre-determined price. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Frost, a unanimous court held that a federal law bars the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over the Nation River in Alaska because the river is not “public land” under the statute. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm
Specifically, according to the Ruling: The data transferred to Google in the US constitutes personal data under the GDPR, especially given that IP addresses and online identifiers could enable foreign intelligence services to identify an individual; and Chapter V of the GDPR was violated because: Google is subject to section 702 FISA as an “electronic communications service provider”; The additional safeguards taken by Google were insufficient at preventing US… [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Evidence was also heard from the private investigators Steve Whittamore and Daniel Portley-Hanks, whose services had been used by MGN. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 11:06 pm
Regulations: FCC Cell Phone Privacy: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sought public comment on its Privacy and Security of Information Stored on Mobile Communications Devices proposed rule. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Financial Services Commission of Ontario. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:04 am
However, insurers of other group insurance schemes may have to consider whether they are providing a service to the public or a section of the public for the purposes of section 29 of the Act. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:29 am
The plaintiff in Reese v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
pour la Commission d’enque? [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm
Forest Service and the mining company. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm
During its November term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Grand Chapter, Order of the Eastern Star of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
United States, 09–1555, Beer v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:14 pm
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightsShumba v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
CLASS ACTION CHALLENGES REDUCTION OF MEDICAID HOME-CARE SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
