Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 13,689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 6:29 am
What is the Suski v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm
The new proclamation applies to the entry into the United States of all noncitizen nonimmigrants (noncitizens who are visiting the United States or otherwise being admitted temporarily) traveling to the United States by air. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Register for the event here. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 3:00 pm
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 3:13 am
The recent opinion in Spring Isle Community Association, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 10:14 am
Amazon and Tice v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Canadian cases where the accused was found guilty of voyeurism: Placing a camera in the ceiling of the male staff bathroom (R v B.H. 2017 ONCJ)Secretly recording persons in the restroom of a restaurant (R v Bosomworth 2015 BCPC)Filming multiple people in multiple public washrooms, including home washroom (R v Dekker 2014 ABPC)An obsession with a victim led an accused to spy on her at work, including while she was in the shower, and recording her while she was… [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 6:28 am
Please register to join us virtually for the 18th Annual ILPC/TICA Indigenous Law Conference! [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
In Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
The styled of the opinion is, Aldo Cueller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:03 am
Pineau v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
As such, Wenman claimed: (i) that Stone’s ‘ARCHANGEL ALCHEMY’ trade mark was invalid, pursuant to s5(4) and s5(4A) TMA (setting out, namely, that a trade mark shall not be registered by virtue of an earlier right existing, i.e. due to laws of passing off); (ii) that Wenman had a defence under section 11(3) TMA (that the registered trade mark is not infringed by use in the course of trade of an earlier right - passing off - used prior to registration of the… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--The Secretary of State shall make each report submitted under this subsection available to the public on the internet website of the Department of State. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
Finally, the notion that federal law controlled infringement of registered trademarks but state law controlled unfair competition arose in the 1940s in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am
Polat v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
The “confusion test” – Sections 12(1)(d) and 16(3)(a) and (b) Section 12(1)(d) states that a mark is registrable if it is not confusing with a registered trademark; sections 16(3)(a) and (b) very similarly provided that a mark must not be confusing with a trademark that had previously been know or applied for. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:22 am
Micro Mobio Corporation v. [read post]
