Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Forthcoming Appeals A number of data protection cases will be the subject of appeal hearings in 2018: TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department – hearing 11 or 12 April 2018 Stunt v Associated Newspapers – hearing on 19 or 20 June 2018. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 13, 2008 Taylor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
State Farm Mutual, No. 20693, Order (Portsmouth Sep. 14, 1995); Schoonmaker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:30 am
One of Holte’s first substantive patent decisions comes in Wanker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
Rodriguez prevented from accessing assistance to end her life, while Gloria Taylor, also suffering from Lou Gehrig’s disease and the main plaintiff in Carter v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
"] Today's Virginia Supreme Court decision in Taylor v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am
(see example below) The Department states this interpretation is supported by a decision issued by the Ohio Supreme Court- Columbus City School District v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
Writing on Lawfare, both Robert Chesney and Margaret Taylor have taken a look at the legal authority under which Trump might, as he has threatened, build a wall pursuant to a declared state of emergency. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 1:14 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Alan Taylor. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:02 pm
The hostility – contrived or otherwise – between Millennials & Generation Z v. [read post]
