Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 40,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Wash.) in Diemert v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
V. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
In other words, the crimes remain state offenses, with state elements. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
First State Ins. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:41 pm
See Mariner LDC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 12:19 pm
Loughman criticized the security pact, stating that it compromises the neutral status of Vanuatu and potentially jeopardizes assistance from China. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:25 am
From Mahmood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
In the words of the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
In the words of the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Medical Associates of Erie v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Raines v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:30 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
EPA and the future of the administrative state. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
EPA and the future of the administrative state. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
