Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Kennedy" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Walter Weber
” Justice Kennedy asked the pertinent question in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
  What people do not seem sure of, however, is how broad or narrow Justice Kennedy’s key middle position in this case will be. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Kali Borkoski
       You reference one case in which the Court had its facts wrong (Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
 Or at the very least, we know that a lot of people and organizations think so. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Balganesh argues that the wrong of trolling is that it encourages trolls to sue people whose uses are harmless to the true author/owner and therefore, in the absence of trolling, tolerated though infringing. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
In a five-to-four opinion by Justice Kennedy, the Court ruled that such observation was generally allowed. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
  There are and always have been Court-related issues that appeal to small cohorts of people. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
    In fact, one commenter on the HuffPost story cited above notes that Romney called on Ted Kennedy to release back returns in the Senate race (which Kennedy did) with the language that "doing anything else would be taken as the Senator hiding something. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:04 am
Supreme Court has decided Florence v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am by Clint Bolick
  The threat of judicial action, such as the specter of overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
"), with Carter, 525 U.S. at 99 (Kennedy, J., concurring) ("The Fourth Amendment protects '[t]he right of the people to be secure in their ... houses,' and it is beyond dispute that the home is entitled to special protection as the center of the private lives of our people. [read post]