Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 6:10 am
Martinez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
In Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600, following a 6 month trial, he found two nursery workers, Dawn Reed and Christopher Lillie had been libelled in a Report commissioned by the Council which accused them of wide-scale sexual abuse of pre-school children. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
The policy choices may be to tell people how they have to present numerators v. denominators. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
If we are going to talk about patents v. copyrights, across the board motivations are the same for sciences and expressive arts. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Cybercrime in particular, is frequently orchestrated on a large if not massive scale and in an increasingly complex manner, as technology develops at a rapidly increasing pace. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:57 pm
All the notional ink spilled in the past week on the question of whether law reviews ought to self-consciously select articles with a thumb on the scales of particular identity traits has certainly been interesting. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
I don't know how NetFlix deals with that situation - not sure I really care frankly - the reason I bring this up is because Silicon Valley is often heralded as the originator of Big Ideas that are promoted by Smart People out to Change the World.Because of this reputation things that happen in the Valley tend to be emulated in other parts of the country because, it seems, everyone feels that if you're going to develop software and compatible hardware you need to behave like those successful… [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
In Hanna v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Scales of justice for everyone. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Scales of justice for everyone. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
The fundamental attributes of a state legislature are that its members are elected by the people and it has authority to make laws. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
It's a Glasgow Coma Scale of 8 or less. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
The next time you wonder whether some judges don't put a "thumb on the scale" even in high-profile criminal cases, remember this one.P.S. - The majority opinion's worth a read as well. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:34 am
But, in a recent case mimicking a morality play, ability to pay stands front and center in a starring role.In Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:32 am
But participating in large-scale litigation like the antitrust case against the NCAA also requires contributing to the plaintiffs' litigation fund. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The Policy, further, states that the focus is on “both people for science and science for people”. [read post]
