Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, because claim preclusion bars re-litigation of claims that should have been brought in the first case even if they were not brought, the dissenters concluded that the plaintiffs were also barred from challenging the mini-hospital requirement.Did the majority ignore the rules of claim preclusion? [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:44 am by Cathy Holmes
Acceptance of minors as investors in EB-5 investment funds poses risks to EB-5 investment funds, escrow banks and EB-5 investors under U.S. laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:44 am by Catherine DeBono Holmes
Acceptance of minors as investors in EB-5 investment funds poses risks to EB-5 investment funds, escrow banks and EB-5 investors under U.S. laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:44 am by Cathy Holmes
Acceptance of minors as investors in EB-5 investment funds poses risks to EB-5 investment funds, escrow banks and EB-5 investors under U.S. laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
There are several individuals up for admission, plus large groups from the Federal Bar Association, Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the Phi Alpha Delta law fraternity. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Both the Jones and Beckles petitions urge prompt action because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s one-year bar on Johnson claims runs June 26, 2016. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
And the U.S. government's position is like "we disagree with Apple on the law and on policy, but we don't want to rule out that Samsung might still somehow become the last victim of an incorrect interpretation. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
California Teachers Association, 14-915, another case affirmed by an equally divided Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985), there is no First Amendment right to use content generated and paid for entirely by another for a purpose contrary to the intent of the content’s creation, and barred by state law. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 10:52 am by Steve Lubet
  Invoking the Code of Conduct for Federal Judges, the former U.S. attorney general and justice of the Texas Supreme Court argues that there are two legitimate questions concerning Judge Curiel’s impartiality. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-789, the Court held that California’s procedural default rule barring claims raised for the first time on state collateral review was sufficiently firmly established and regularly followed to legitimately bar review of habeas claims, shockingly resulting in a reversal of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]