Search for: "U.S. v. Harris" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm by Ken White
Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 768–69, 106 S.Ct. 1558, 1559, 89 L.Ed.2d 783 (1986) (private figure); Bentley v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Harris"When the Trouble Started": The Story of Frontiero v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Environmental Protection Agency will be represented by U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574, 604 n.30 (1983) (upholding denial of tax exemption to university that discriminated based on race); Harris v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:15 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Western District of Virginia in which the Court granted class certification to plaintiffs who also challenged Virginia’s same-sex marriage ban in Harris et. al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
A Very Long Limitation Period for Unjust Enrichment Claims in McConnell v HuxtableEx-lawyer who used his firm’s credit card to start new firm gets probationIs Rob Ford baiting anti-gay voters? [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:06 am by Howard Friedman
 The Court of Appeals held that the district court erred in rejecting plaintiff's claim for a vegan diet merely on the ground that it was not a mandatory tenet of Rastafarianism.In Harris v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He added that Harry Truman had called King a rabble-rouser. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:12 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post is shared from thehill.comLabor unions are at risk of having one of their most successful organizing tactics nullified by the Supreme Court.On Tuesday, the high court will hear oral arguments in Harris V. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Mar. 15, 2013) (noting that predictive coding is “an automated method that credible sources say has been demonstrated to result in more accurate searches at a fraction of the cost of human reviewers” and relying in part on its availability to reject a law firm’s undue burden objection to a subpoena served on it); Harris v. [read post]