Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States is available on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
United States (06-7517), on whether a district court must provide a criminal defendant notice of the contemplated grounds for a sentence above the range recommended by the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
The President of the United States withdrew, and the Senate adjourned. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:38 am by Amy Howe
The last time a firing squad was used in the United States was in Utah in 2010. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Breyer, also supported the delay, but said that the case “will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United [v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
  Section 1981, passed during Reconstruction, provides that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws preempt several provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Katherine Pompilio
United States metastasized into a massive system restraining the speech of millions. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am by Rory Little
United States to allow a redaction that replaced Greene’s name with blanks in his non-testifying codefendants’ statements. [read post]