Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
The verdict was returned on September 23, 2021, in the California Superior Court case of Richmond Compassionate Care Collective v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court refused to defend Roe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:17 pm
Plantronics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
California alone has 75,000 — more than any other state. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:18 pm
Earlier today, United States District Judge James V. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:18 pm
Earlier today, United States District Judge James V. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Tension between Trade Secret and California’s Section 16600 Most states in the United States have adopted some form of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act which protects information considered to be valuable due to its secrecy. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:23 pm
Lavallie (Indian Child Welfare Act - Concurrent Jurisdiction) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlJamul Action Committee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Feb 26, 2007) (available for download below): The sky is not completely falling in California after Cunningham v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:47 am
In American Forest Resources Council v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
CA Supreme Court Holds That Song-Beverly Does Not Apply To Online Purchases For Electronic Downloads
5 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm
In Pineda v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
And, as a backstop, it's a call to the Governor and Legislature to pick up the baton as well -- just in case the courts feel constrained by precedent and/or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
It seems certain that a ruling in favor of Ross, therefore, would lead to an immediate petition for review before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]
