Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
Kerry Washington plays Professor Anita Hill and and Wendell Pierce plays Judge (later Justice) Thomas.Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am
Despite all the talk of stasis and crisis in Washington, Congress is still passing modestly useful legislation on cyber issues. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:19 am
Justice Kennedy in Vieth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
.'"From "Supreme Court seems to side with web designer opposed to same-sex marriage/Colorado’s Lorie Smith says being forced to create websites for gay couples would violate her right to free speech" by Robert Barnes , reports on the oral argument in 303 Creative v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:33 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Supreme Court finds Florida's capital punishment process unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the most recent episode of the National Security Law Podcast, in which they discuss domestic terrorism as a legal and political category, a pending cert petition before the Supreme Court in DHS v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Despite all the talk of stasis and crisis in Washington, Congress is still passing modestly useful legislation on cyber issues. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
Washington. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
The justices issued an opinion yesterday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Additional coverage of the order in the Texas case comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who notes that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes focuses on the dissent authored by Justice Stevens in McDonald and Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in that case, characterizing them as the last in a series of intellectual “duels. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
Robert Barnes has this article on the two cases for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
And so it began, this documentary of the adventures of a law student and his three-legged cat in Washington, DC. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:20 pm
Pravda The Washington Post gave the Roberts quote practically it's own paragraph. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
At the Washington Post, Dana Milbank notes that the case “shows the struggle of an 18th-century legal system to keep up with 21st-century technology”; Nina Totenberg of NPR, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Bill Mears of CNN, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Jesse Holland of the Associated Press offer more coverage. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
