Search for: "YOUNG v. STATE" Results 1941 - 1960 of 8,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
" It doesn't matter that we all know that pretty much every bank is insured by the FDIC or that a particular child is super young; that state still has to introduce some sort of minimal evidence that establishes that these elements are met. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Some might argue that neither v-Lex or Fastcase is young enough genuinely to be labelled “disrupter”, but both have built reputations valued for innovation, expertise and quality, and their combined reach is extensive, maybe reflecting their maturity and adult behaviours. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  For example, the federal government sometimes “confesses error” on the question presented, and aligns itself with its adversary on that question — or even on the invalidity of the judgment below, as in Young v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
Without any other low-level entry positions, young workers feel compelled to take these jobs. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
This is all a bit harsh, I think, and surprisingly so.Andrew Gregor is hanging out online in 2011 or so and having a fun, sexy conversation with someone young. [read post]
The court considered the Prisons and Young Offenders Institutions (Scotland) Rules 1994 SI 1994/1931 (“the Prison Rules”) and Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
  The AmeriKat met Philippe Campolini (Simont Braun) several years ago at the Young EPLAW Congress over a beer in Brussels. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:31 pm by Meagan Burrows
The ACLU has blocked all of these abortion bans from taking effect, and abortion is still legal in all 50 states. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
Consultants, Inc., 293 F.3d 708, 712 (4th Cir. 2002) (a case I still discuss in my Internet Law course) and especially Young v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Madelaine Lane
On Monday, January 23, 2012, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a statement regarding the motion for disqualification of Justice Markman in Lawrence v. [read post]