Search for: "AT&T"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 881,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
This is also corroborated by the second paragraph on page 2 of the application […] according to which the device according to the invention is suitable for segregating both liquids and solid particles from gases generated in any type of device.Incidentally, it is noted that the German application (DE 102004006834 A1) the priority of which is claimed by the present application has been classified also in the higher-ranking class B04C 5/24 by the DPMA.Board of appeal decision T 542/00,… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, according to established case law, an objection raised in opposition must be substantiated in the notice of opposition in such a way that the facts and arguments are sufficient for the EPO and the patent proprietor to understand the case against the patent without further investigation (T 2/89 [3]). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
T 303/90 [3.1.2, 3.2]). [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:56 am
Empathy isn't dictated to us by a focus group or statistical analysis. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
Nicholas, just weren’t there. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:52 am
While most of the discussion focused on the latest pronouncements of social media, during my presentation on Vine and other photo/video social media sites, he also mentioned something that hasn’t often been discussed as well: employee use of smartphones to take pictures or videos in the workplace. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:32 am
In December, President Obama signed legislation repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 9:08 am
Why Don’t Students Like School: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom, by Daniel T. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The fear and loathing index on AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile just keeps rising. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
Cole noted that AT&T and T-Mobile compete head-to-head in 97 of the nation’s largest 100 cellular marketing areas as well as nationwide for business and government customers. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Granville T. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
Sorry telecom companies, but you aren't allowed to bombard consumers with indiscriminate rate hikes. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
Sorry telecom companies, but you aren't allowed to bombard consumers with indiscriminate rate hikes. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
In this opposition appeal, the Board found that claim 1 of the Main Request, relating to a high strength pearlitic steel rail defined by several ranges of alloying elements, although overlapping with the composition of a pearlitic rail disclosed in D1, is novel. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
In this opposition appeal, the Board found that claim 1 of the Main Request, relating to a high strength pearlitic steel rail defined by several ranges of alloying elements, although overlapping with the generic composition of a pearlitic rail disclosed in D1, is novel. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 12:35 pm
A glance at T-Mobile's unlock FAQ, which appears unchanged since before last week's bill was signed into law, clarifies that requested phones won't unlock unless they've been paid in full and haven't been reported stolen, among other requirements. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 10:56 am
This constitutes an undue burden (see T 516/99 [3.1]). [3.6] That means that the fact that this can be done by routine experimentation is not sufficient for the subject-matter claimed to meet the requirements of A 83. [3.7] To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
This has not been disputed. [1.2.2] The opponents have argued however that the aspects of the invention referring to transparency, translucency and clearness were merely aesthetic properties, not contributing to the solution of any technical problem and, thus, the purely esthetical features of present claim 1 were not to be considered as part of the technical problem solved for the purpose of assessing inventive step, as established in T 641/00. [1.2.3] The Board notes preliminarily that,… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:36 pm
T. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The facts must also plausibly explain that the events stated were the cause of the failure to observe the time limit (T 13/82). [read post]
