Search for: "BAKER v. STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
Yesterday, CAAF issued its decision in Center for Constitutional Rights v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
In exempting the ‘slave’ victim from the protection of the common law of battery as the state Supreme Court had done in State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am by Jack Goldsmith
Stewart Baker points to a provision in Congress’s continuing resolution that is the first serious attempt I have seen to punish (as opposed to rail against) China for its cybersecurity practices. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Part III expands from the Alaska Supreme Court’s monumental decision in John v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm by Anonymous
 Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of  a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm by Matt Johnston
 Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of  a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:27 am by WSLL
BAKER and BRYNER FARMS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For a while, there was a mismatch, but what happened was that courts began to understand that fabric designs weren’t going to give them what they needed to handle software, so they reached back to Baker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
(ret), a leading expert in information age conflict and the law of war, has stated unequivocally that t [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
In this case, respondent Myriad Genetics holds a patent on two genes, mutations in which are correlated with a higher risk of breast or ovarian cancer, in their “isolated” state. [read post]