Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That case also raises the issue of whether the Supreme Court has already given the states clear-cut authority to refuse to allow same-sex marriages, by a summary, one-sentence ruling it issued in 1972 in a Minnesota case (Baker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:46 am by Moseley Collins
In Delaney v Baker (1999) 20 Cal.4th 23, 31, the California Supreme Court explained that recklessness under the Elder Abuse Act refers to a subjective state of culpability greater than simple negligence, which has been described as deliberate disregard of the high degree of probability that an injury will occur [citing BAJI 12.77 (defining recklessness in the context of an intentional infliction of emotional distress action)]. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:51 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Department of Public Health case in 2008, which brought marriage to Connecticut, and co-counseled in the Baker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores — scope of the legal duty of a company under the federal law banning workplace discrimination based on a worker or job applicant’s religion Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1125 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993); Crimm v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]