Search for: "BRIDGES v. STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Several Election Deniers Backed by Trump Prevail in Hotly Contested Primaries MSN – Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2022 Several election deniers backed by former President Trump prevailed in closely watched primaries on August 2, as a nationwide battle over the future of the GOP played out in state and federal races across five states. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But she also was the bridge from the first, solo female Supreme Court Justice to a Court with three at once. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post, we had provided a descriptive comment of the decision of the Supreme Court in MP Rural Road Development Authority v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:43 am by AmandaWilwert
The Court’s decision in Global Military Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm by Jay Stanley
(There is one legitimate Free Speech Zone we don’t have a problem with, it’s called the United States of America.) [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:06 pm
Way cool.And of course September (at least part of it) is still in summer (at least in the northern hemisphere) . . .16th ECSL Summer Course on Space Law and Policy September 3-14, 2007, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.My kind of summer school.SPACE 2007 Sept. 18-20, 2007 Long Beach, California; not just law, but includes policy panels, a session on space law chaired by Mark Simonoff of the State Department and lots more.Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition -- 2007 World Finals… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
I think these precautions aren't as violative of the threat victims' dignity, because they don't enlist the state on the side of the criminal threatener. [read post]