Search for: "Ball v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
At the moment, the law across Europe about how to decide what is and is not patentable is not settled, even though the same law should effectively apply in all member states of the EPC (comprising all 27 EU states together with a few other non-EU states). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:47 pm
Federal Way School District v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:09 am
During oral argument in Berghuis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
In Lancôme v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:28 am
The question in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Presumably what's good for the United States is good for everyone else too. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
I suppose for Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
States what medication he was on, and how severe they thought his condition was. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
States what medication he was on, and how severe they thought his condition was. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
At the end of his decision, Judge Carney recalled a passage from Berger v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:44 pm
In Stenberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
And many state offenses as well. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Drop the ball. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Perfect Web v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
Thus, for example, in Thompson v. [read post]
