Search for: "Brand v. Brand" Results 1961 - 1980 of 9,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
However, I recently re-visited a 1929 case with an intriguing family connection:  Dedman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:06 am
Gemstar, whose prolific past litigation record has apparently led to its former chief executive being branded a "patent terrorist" alleges infringement of three European Patents by Virgin for its use of certain Interactive Programme Guide (IPG) technology. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:33 am
Gemstar, whose prolific past litigation record has apparently led to its former chief executive being branded a "patent terrorist" alleges infringement of three European Patents by Virgin for its use of certain Interactive Programme Guide (IPG) technology. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
  Two years ago, the Court launched a thousand law review articles on this topic with its decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:22 am by nflatow
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the featured speaker at the event, had an answer for Maltz’s brand of originalism, highlighted by ABC News. read more [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
We first reported about this case here: http://wombletradesecrets.blogspot.com/2009/04/starwood-hotels-v-hilton-hotels-trade.html. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
We first reported about this case here: http://wombletradesecrets.blogspot.com/2009/04/starwood-hotels-v-hilton-hotels-trade.html. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:25 pm by Steve Baird
Supreme Court ruled “shredded wheat” generic for a type of cereal in Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
Little Hare Gin had not provided any evidence of use in the marketplace or stated whether these brands had registered their marks. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 am
It is his name that is at the heart of the litigation in J and J Crombie Ltd v Nutter (Holdings) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3459 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mrs Justice Asplin dating back to 11 November. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
However, considering that the Bill only places restrictions on the display of the brand logo and brand name and does not completely disallow it, the constitutional challenge is unlikely to hold ground. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Larry
Pick your own fandom.The cause for all this pop culture excitement is the decision in In Zone Brands, Inc. and Good2Grow, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:50 pm
Never Too Late 130 [week ending on Sunday 8 January] | Around the IP Blogs | Sunday Surprises | Trademark and co-branding as a badge of … did you say "location"(?) [read post]