Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 55,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 11:35 am
Davidson & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:17 pm
Read the opinion in the case, Zimmerman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:21 am
State, 667 So.2d 410 (Fla 1DCA 1996), rehearing denied, but the general rule is that non-consensual recordings are prohibited. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
The American Civil Liberties Union called it “the single largest dismissal of wrongful convictions in the nation’s history. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an individual knew the alleged offending conduct was prohibited… [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:18 pm
Blog reader Ryan Scott has called to my attention the decision by the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:09 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Since such a person does not exist, being neither more nor less than a legal construct, the calling of some internet users to give evidence was not probative of the state of mind of the reasonably well-informed and observant internet user. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
I am reporting on it primarily to call attention to the issue. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
For that reason, the Court has often stood with the least popular in our society and, since Marbury v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
Does the state’s emphasis on the so-called “hosting rule” mean the state is abandoning its defense of the law’s content promotion restrictions? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:38 pm
The justices are expected to issue a final ruling on the case in question, Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
But Doe v. [read post]