Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 3:49 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
Destefano>, No. 07-1428 and 08-328Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discriminationo April 22, 2009 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Cornell Law School/LII hereo Noted here: Connecticut Employment Law… [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:52 am
Hardwick and Hawaii Housing v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:29 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyHewlettt-Packard Infringed on Data Processing Patent Licensed to Cornell UniversityCornell Univ. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Kansas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:04 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in FCC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
John Blume, of Cornell Law School in Ithaca, N.Y., will argue for the criminal defendant. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:15 am
, (International Society of Family Law: Regional Conference in Israel, June 7-9, 2009).Ann Laquer Estin, Unofficial Family Law, (February 1, 2009).From Bepress:Abeer Ghazi Jarrar, Combating a Religious Radical Ideology v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:42 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bobby v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:44 am
  The Legal Workshop is something that’s been sorely needed, and we look forward to its success. [ Extra credit problem: those interested in seeing what “writing for the public” means might be interested in a “compare and contrast”   reading of yesterday’s syllabus in Arizona v. [read post]