Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 207,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Next month the state of Arizona is expected to file a cert. petition seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision, which upheld a district court’s order enjoining the state from enforcing several sections of S.B. 1070, the state’s immigration law enforcement legislation. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
The AEP v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:29 am
The United States Supreme Court just decided FCC v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:14 am
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 11:31 pm
Supreme Court ruled Monday against strengthening marriage rights for binational couples who wish to live together in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2021, 12:16 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that prohibits most abortions after fifteen weeks.[1] This case, Jackson Women's Health Organization v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:55 am
Today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
Here are my thoughts on the Suoreme Court's decision yesterday in Chaidez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
”) State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:00 am
Perlin (New York Law School), Talia Roitberg Harmon (Niagara University), Maren Geiger (Niagara University), 'The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream': How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court’s Decision in Panetti v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:19 am
The post State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
The Supreme Court has docketed a cert petition in the capital case of Loving v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inVoisine v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In Rucho v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:41 am
I'm looking forward to the Supreme Court's ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
