Search for: "Deal v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 26,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 6:10 am
Jeff White v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
In Stein v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:54 am
In the meantime, the ruling deals an indelible blow to government workers’ public unions in 22 states and time will tell how these unions respond to the decision. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:11 pm
The majority in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 6:06 am
The case is styled, William Blevins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
FRANCES V. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
And, of course, the Old Court that battled the New Deal relied on these cases and such classic distinctions as "commerce" v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:08 am
It also rejects the state's argument that the verdict form demonstrated jury confusion.The case is Saber v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
They find that this duty is underpinned by the notion that a person such as the appellant should be afforded as much opportunity as reasonably possible to accommodate and deal with such a decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Royal Assent is given by an Order in Council, on the recommendation of a Standing Committee of the Privy Council which deals with the affairs of Jersey and Guernsey. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:42 pm
In Owens v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
West v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am
” The Labour Appeal Court then went on to cite the Edcon v Pillemer judgment stating that: “It is however always better if such evidence is led by people who are in a position to testify to such breakdown. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:45 am
Bader v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
Riegel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
