Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2017, 2:14 pm
In one of our previous posts (September 1, 2016), we discussed a recent decision of the Federal Supreme Court (judgment of June 21, 2016, docket no: X ZR 41/15) in this respect, essentially paving the way for letterbox NPEs but still leaving some questions unanswered. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:03 am
How the new procedural rule will interact with core constitutional values and established legal principles, as well as what the practical consequences of the rule are, remain open questions. (1) Fourth Amendment The proposed changes may well fall afoul of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm
Comment Eagerly awaited by media lawyers, this decision does not provide the clarity on the recoverability of additional liabilities which might have been hoped. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
As you may recall, the FTC is pursuing 1-800 Contacts for antitrust violations based on 1-800 Contacts having sued and then settled with competitors who bought keyword ads on 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 10:41 am
But if the search only violates Rule 41 but does not violate the Fourth Amendment, then in most jurisdictions it will be suppressed only in limited circumstances. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm
Case of a Regulation that Does the Opposite of a Statute appeared first on Discourse.net. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
In relation to Nike Intl’s EP 1 571 938 "footwear incorporating a textile with fusible filaments and fibers" the German Federal Patent Court had previously declared that all claims invalid for lack of inventive step starting from the German published examined application ("Auslegeschrift") DE 1 085 173 of 1954 in combination with US 2,440,393 of 1948. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Unlike Beard, Klarman does not focus only on the Framers, and he avoids Beard’s missteps. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The focus is on CSR (1) as a subject of legal regulation within states, (2) as a matter of international law and compliance beyond the state, and (3) as a tool and methodology for privatizing regulation through the enterprise itself operating in global production chains. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:30 am
All 41 others were convicted of conduct that had some external trajectory: namely, they were accused of funding, training with, or fighting on behalf of terrorist organizations overseas. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
,[iii] does no more than help people learn to live with the problem, instead of law societies solving the problem. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
” (Id. at 41 & 42.) [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm
In response, Twitter has withdrawn its complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 without prejudice. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:32 am
However, the real danger in drunk driving is that it can and often does result in serious personal injury or death. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
” Exxon Corp., 533 S.W.2d at 847 (quoting 41 Tex. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
Most although not all states have adopted some version of UIDDA, codified in North Carolina in G.S. 1F-1 through 1F-7. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
" [Article 1(2)]The question that arises - and has actually arisen - is who is responsible for paying such royalty.The Resal Right Directive - in my view and contrary to the reasons for harmonization within Recital 9 - fails to provide a uniform response, in that Article 1(4) therein does not really mandate a harmonized approach at the level of individual Member States. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
