Search for: "Does 1 - 64"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Her parents pursued a negligence action, but the domestic law does not provide a remedy for parents of grown-up children. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
ASCAP, 627 F. 3d 64, 69 (C.A.2, 2010). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 pm
Claim 1 reads as follows. 1. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
USDA does NOT object to such disclaimers. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
You may be surprised to learn that age does not correlate with frequency of injury. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:20 pm
The reports included 1 robbery, 1 assault, 2 burglaries, 2 incidents of domestic violence, and 6 cases of police force. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:58 am
With relentless and ruthless logic, therefore, the BoA concluded: It follows from the above finding that the process of manufacture to which claim 1 of auxiliary request 23 [the Swiss-form claim], in view of its content, is directed goes beyond the scope of protection conferred by the use claims as granted: in the case of claims directed to a process of manufacture, the effect of Article 64(2) EPC is to extend protection to the "product" obtained by such process… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
This post reproduces key extracts from the two judgments with brief comments, on some of the issues before the Court. 1. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:37 pm
But why does McKinsey say so? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
5 (1). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
64 SMU L. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Holder, 64 Vanderbilt L. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:02 am
The age breakdown was 30.9% under 18, 32.8% from 25 to 44, 21.6% from 45 to 64, and 8.8% 65 years of age or older. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:08 am
The major age breakdown was 28.5% under 18, 24.8% from 25 to 44, and 29.2% from 45 to 64. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Rabin, The Renaissance of Accident Law Plans Revisited, 64 Md. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
Merits 1. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:44 am
Sessions on first, second and third Tuesdays at 1:00 and 4:00 PM (traffic and criminal) and fourth Tuesdays at 1:00 PM. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
” Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:22 am
But this rule does not apply if the taxpayer knows (or has reason to know) that the estimate is unreasonable (citing Reg. section 1.170A-1(h)(4)(ii)). [read post]
