Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 11:51 am
July 14, 2011) English v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice were heard on 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
(v) if those allegations were justiciable, should the court exercise its jurisdiction be exercised in this case? [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm
Alternatively, who has the authority to permit parties to make a choice of law: the state or the parties themselves? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Flores (08-294) — state power to control English language instruction (cases consolidated for one-hour argument) Tuesday, April 21: Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
The court in Himmelsetin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm
He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
This involved the absorption of the values underlying Article 8 ECHR into English law. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
MERS v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:20 am
Mekonen v LB Waltham Forest, County Court at Central London, 8 August 2022 Ms Mekonen was a refugee from Ethiopia with limited ability to speak or read English. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Robins v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm
United States English. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:54 am
Cantu v Texas, Tex. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
English lawyers are less likely to fully appreciate the authoritativeness of an unreported New York state trial decision versus a well-reasoned decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, applying New York law. [read post]
