Search for: "EVANS v. STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 7:08 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Djanogly v Westminster City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 432 (19 April 2011) ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 440 (19 April 2011) Thorne v Courtier & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 460 (19 April 2011) CMA- CGM Marseille v Petro Broker International [2011] EWCA Civ 461 (19 April 2011) Sandhu (t/a Isher Fashions UK) v Jet Star Retail Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 459 (19 April 2011) Beedles… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division, citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Tolub v Evans, 58 NY2d 1, held that OCA’s action “does not offend due process,” because in matters concerning the State’s budget, “equal protection does not require that all classifications be made with mathematical precision. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3rd Cir. 1995), the Third Circuit took note of the Friedrich and Bates decisions, pointing out that in Friedrich the court focused on the child, "look[ing] back in time, not forward. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:07 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
The Ministerial exception in US case law On 28 March 2011 the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Perich v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Howard Wasserman
(Or, at the very least, such a claim would have had to run through catch-all substantive due process and City of Sacramento v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
(Or, at the very least, such a claim would have had to run through catch-all substantive due process and City of Sacramento v. [read post]