Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 30,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:09 am by Bryan West
Clark Holdings Ltd. v. 1352986 Alberta Ltd., 2023 ABQB 219 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:08 pm
";  and the Florida Supreme Court citing what it called the "still valid law of Plessy v. [read post]
In other words, it would create significant red tape and compliance costs in an attempt to address an issue that is mostly peripheral to the stated aims, and arguably already dealt with by EU courts in Huawei v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]