Search for: "FRANCE v. STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 2:41 pm by Catherine Jasserand
The plaintiff considered that the Court of Appeals had failed to check whether the infringed works were available on a website accessible from France and whether the products could be sold to French customers. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
Article V obligates U.S. support in an armed attack against “territories under the administration of Japan. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Igor De Lazari
The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF), for example, has already ruled as much in State of Parana v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
France TikTok has been given a €5 million penalty by France’s data protection watchdog CNIL for breaking its rules on cookie consent. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat)   Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46)   France Paris - Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Post Scriptum ● Dirk Voorhoof, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression expert, has published a five year retrospective on the impact of the seminal Delfi v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
 Tell that to the European Court of Justice in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, as criticised by the referring court here. [read post]