Search for: "Fall v. State Bar"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
This contested concurrent use proceeding involved an application to register the mark BOI NA BRAZA, in standard character form, for restaurant and bar services, with a geographic restriction claiming the entire United States except New Jersey. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:50 am
Finally, citing general preemption principles, the Court noted that PAGA is part of California’s legislative scheme for enforcing the Labor Code, which falls within the state’s police powers. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:52 pm
However, he said the buyer failed to state viable aiding and abetting claims, civil conspiracy, conversion and Colorado and Texas state law charges. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:47 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; Meri V. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:59 am
That said, I don't think that Judge Taylor's decision falls into that camp. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
The facts of the 2011 Supreme Court case of Thompson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
June 14, 2023) — ruling that communications between South Dakota state officials and the National Guard (a hybrid state-federal entity) did not fall within Exemption 5’s consultant corollary exception because they were not made for purpose of aiding the National Guard’s deliberations; noting that its ruling “produced an odd outcome considering that these discussions would be protected either under Exemption 5 (if wholly federal) and under South… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
This is pursuant to the court’s ruling in the landmark case of DeBellis v Property Clerk of the City of New York in 1992. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Both the Jones and Beckles petitions urge prompt action because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s one-year bar on Johnson claims runs June 26, 2016. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
” Further there is no legal bar to it doing so. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:40 am
Supreme Court has ruled in Rotkiske v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:51 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Out-of-Court Statements; HearsayR. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:25 pm
” In other words, not all actions, including actions which may fall under the rubric of products liability actions, against an entity, otherwise also a seller of products, are barred by the Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Under the court’s normal procedures, the case – in which a Missouri church is arguing that its exclusion from a state program that provides funds to nonprofits to resurface their playgrounds with rubber from recycled tires violates the Constitution – would have been argued in either April or fall of 2016. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Thus, once a copyright owner has shown use of the copyrighted work, the burden of proving that the use was authorized falls squarely on the defendant. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
