Search for: "French v. French"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 11:16 am
Skinner v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:54 pm
Arbitral Awards Violating European Antitrust Laws: French Courts Cannot Help Are French courts willing to review arbitral awards on the... [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
Schneider, a large French electrical company wanted to acquire control of Legrand, another large French electrical company, by means of a public exchange offer for shares (the offer) on the Paris Bourse. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:09 am
x predatory, inordinately greedy ( < rapere to seize (see rape v.2) + -? [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
But years later, Marshall made his thoughts clear about the treaty clause in an 1823 decision called American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:52 am
In October 2008, following an investigation, the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) decided that, owing to the de facto ban on all internet sales, PFDC’s distribution agreements amounted to anti-competitive agreements contrary to both French law and European Union competition law. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
In 2009, the civil case of Wiwa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
In 2009, the civil case of Wiwa v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
Apparently, this does not interfere with the French court's judicial sovereignty. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:57 am
bas Klubs v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:47 am
However, the closure of the Argentina branch which has not been blacklisted and the drop in BNP Paribas makes the explanation by French bank executives unlikely.If the G-20 black list forced BNP Paribas to sell its Panama branch, why did BNP also sell their Argentine branch after doing business for 95 years? [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:23 pm
It argued that the word “translations” in the agreement referred to translations into any languages other than English or French, since the agreement already included specific terms in English and French. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:13 am
The judge hearing the application considered section 103(2)(b) of the Act and held that, since the parties had not agreed the law by which the Agreement to arbitrate should be governed, it was subject to French law as the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Leister, V. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Interestingly, the same approach referred above has been confirmed by the ECJ in a ruling issued two days later on the case Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni, trekking at Reisen GmbH. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:05 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
The Court first held that the presumptive privilege for total legal costs recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in Maranda v Richer applies in the civil context. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 5:50 am
In French it should be -- the Article 7 term -- distinction, a term at times properly used in the French translation of the judgment (which may well be the original), but even there at times the "caractère distinctif" raises its head (e.g. in para. 25 of the judgment), while the proper term should have been "distinction".The problem thus is one of proper translation, rather than sloppy language in the original. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court has ruled in Scott v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:04 am
Mullen v. [read post]
