Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
See image of Trustee's Deed recorded in the Harris County Clerk's Office below: FIRST THE DUNNING, THEN THE DEED Section 1692e(5) prohibits threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken, while  Section 1692e(2) prohibits falsely representing . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Among the issues that the Court refused to hear were these: ** A plea to consider overruling a 2002 decision, Harris v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:05 pm
" That precedent was set in 2004, in Harris. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
In 2014, long time Senator from Nevada Harry Reid, who was also a family friend of Catherine’s, endorsed her as his replacement for Senator. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:44 am
Feb. 27, 2009)(Paul Green)(personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendant, Texas Longarm Statute, minimum contacts, UFTA, transfer of real estate interest in Texas, oil and gas law) RETAMCO OPERATING, INC. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm by Deirdre Schifeling
While those efforts did not secure Harris a win, in the 10 states where abortion rights were on the ballot, seven voted to safeguard abortion rights in their state constitutions. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, to the extent that the complaint was vague as to the nature of the allegations of legal malpractice and otherwise deficient, the evidence submitted, including the plaintiff’s affidavit, sufficiently remedied any pleading defects and put the defendants on notice of the grounds for her [*2]cause of action alleging legal malpractice (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d at 873; Harris v Barbera, 96 AD3d 904, 906; cf. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Court in Reeves stated that "[i]n the analogous context of summary judgment under Rule 56, we have stated that the court must review the record 'taken as a whole'," citing Matsushita Elec. [read post]