Search for: "High v State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 35,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue, which asks “whether states are free to erect a wall between church and state high enough to exclude religious groups from some state benefits,” is “a proxy battle over school choice. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:45 am by Michael W. Groebe
While the Colorado high court’s decision will clearly have an impact on Colorado employers, employers in other states with “life-style” laws, such as Illinois, will also want to keep a close eye on this decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
d) Assault on board ship upon the high seas with intent to do bodily harm. 8. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am by sally
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd… [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:46 pm
The Legal Service reminds EU member states that they can't just go off and make their own agreements to cover areas that fall within the EU's exclusive competence. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Depending upon who you ask, this has either always been the law in Maryland (as Maryland high court tells us in Maurer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:25 am
If you decide to engage police officers in a high-speed car chase, be prepared to die.That is rule of law which was espoused by the United States Supreme Court -- our nation's highest court -- in the case of Scott v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
From the IPKat's charming and erudite friend Kaori Minami comes news that the keenly-awaited judgment of the Tokyo High Court in Apple v Samsung has just been released (the judgment was handed down on 28 February). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:09 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) Dewan & Ors v Lewis [2010] EWCA Civ 1382 (09 December 2010) Shah v Shah [2010] EWCA Civ 1408 (09 December 2010) Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA v Sinochem Tianjin Ltd (Aconcagua) [2010] EWCA Civ 1403 (09 December 2010) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Yahoo! [read post]