Search for: "House v. House"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 41,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 10:19 am
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:32 am
Scottish & Newcastle plc (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Raguz (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) [2008] UKHL 65 (29 October 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Wife’s expert testified the house was worth $505,000. [read post]
OH8: Defendant was stopped without RS as officers were awaiting a SW for his house; car stop invalid
29 Dec 2010, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:20 pm
The compromise bill, H.R. 6172, was worked out between House leadership as well as the House Judiciary and House Intelligence committees. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 5:51 pm
Comments Go To the White House Office of Management and Budget Note that these comments go to the White House Office of Management and Budget, not to the PTO. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
Today’s opinion in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Makisi v Birmingham City Council; Yosief v Same; Nagi v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 355; [2011] WLR (D) 124 “An applicant for housing under the homelessness provisions who, on an review of a decision to refuse accommodation, had a right to make oral representations where there had been a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, could insist on a face-to-face hearing with the reviewer at which he or his representative could make representations. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:48 pm
DISMISSED AT BENCH TRIAL – State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:47 am
R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [2008] UKHL 14; WLR (D) 64 “A child who had been provided with accommodation by the housing department of a local authority but had not been brought to the attention of their children's services department had not been ‘looked after’ under s 22(1) of the Children Act 1989 and was accordingly not entitled, having reached 18, to support under the Act as a ‘former relevant… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:41 pm
Housing law, law [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:46 pm
Nuance Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:11 am
Patent amendment is not making a different claim Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer International Holdings Inc and Another House of Lords “When a reference was made under section 37(1)(a) of the Patents Act 1977 for joint ownership of a patent and the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks was seised of the matter, an amendment to claim sole ownership of the patent did not amount to the making of a new or different claim. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:07 am
The transcript in Hamer v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:40 am
In Stevens v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:05 pm
in Ninth Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:05 pm
Manning Support Group Sues Over Border Seizure of Laptop :: Documents & Other Resources in House v. [read post]
