Search for: "In Matter of Stewart"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 am
Stewart Baker posted the latest edition of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast: </center> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">And Ben <a data-cke-saved-href="https://lawfareblog.com/event-video-cybersecurity-trump-administration-what-should-we-expect"… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Examples of overt disruption: Stewart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be represented, was suspended when they rebelled, and… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
State Department acknowledge normative ambiguity, arguing that “concerns relating to compliance involve matters of interpretation. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 8:11 am
In other words, I agree with what you write above: most training will occur no matter what, just as in the context of debates about defining trade secrets cautiously, pricing and customer service will occur no matter what, and thereby, anything that is intrinsic to production and business competition loses the justification of restriction [and really, we are having the same debates across all innovation policy fields: what kinds of creativity and invention will we see under… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
While the question of whether there was sufficient evidence to convict is certainly of concern to the state, it is the precedent here that most matters. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumSandy Levinson I have been teaching courses on American constitutional law for almost 50 years. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Other than a potential remand of the "fair use" question to the Federal Circuit, Google cannot realistically hope for anything positive to come out of yesterday's Supreme Court hearing in Google v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
The government seeks 25 years imprisonment for the group’s founder and leader that day, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, and sentences ranging from 10 to 21 years for the other eight. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
In those circuits that have not recognized ascertainability as such, however, the need for minitrials still matters, and the defendant can make largely the same type of argument under Rule 23(b)(3), due process and the Rules Enabling Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
As Justice Potter Stewart observed, such cases require the Court to "define what may be indefinable. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
The death-knell of ACORN’s hopes that this could be dismissed as a right-wing frame-up sounded when Jon Stewart came along and kicked them in the nuts. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
” Perhaps the concurring opinions of Jones persuaded Judge Sentelle to look at the matter differently. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
Matter of Penrod, 50 F.3d 459, 461 (7th Cir. 1995). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:27 am
Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart report for Reuters. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
Michael Dreeben, a longtime deputy solicitor general who specializes in criminal matters, is here today for the first time in quite a while. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:16 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Stewart M. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
This appears to be a matter of first impression both in Delaware courts, and, to the best of the court’s research, elsewhere. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
That he has no proof doesn't seem to matter; by sheer repetition, his false claims are wheedling their way into the consciousness of the public. [read post]
