Search for: "In Re: White v."
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
Eisen, Trigger-Happy: Re-thinking the “Weapons Effect”, 14 Journal on Firearms & Public Policy 89 (2002).As it turns out, very similar research by Dr. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
Remember the white collar criminal defense that got WilmerHale sued? [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
In 1972, in Laird v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:36 pm
West v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Does 1,337; Adult Source Media v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
* In re Indiana Newspapers Inc., 2012 WL 540796 (Ind. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
For example, an employee may claim that the black workers were twice as likely to be laid off as white workers. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
Hence, in that context the Court has limited its acceptance to respect the legislature’s policy choice as not “manifestly without reasonable foundation” to circumstances where an alleged difference in treatment resulted from a transitional measure forming part of a scheme carried out in order to correct an inequality (see Stec and Others, cited above, §§ 61-66; Runkee and White, cited above, §§ 40-41 and British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Oregon (1908) White Court: Buchanan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Coop., 845 F.3d 1135, 1144 (11th Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Commonwealth’s Motion to Appoint Counsel Against or Directed to Def. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 12:41 pm
White RabbitState v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Last week, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:20 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in 2003’s Dastar v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
The court’s conservative majority (Thomas, Rehnquist, Scalia, White and Kennedy) in 1993’s Heller v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
As one official put it, "removing bad information" is "one of the easy, low-bar things you guys [can] do to make people like me"—that is, White House officials—"think you're taking action. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
