Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 1961 - 1980 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Kennedy, J put it thus in a different context from the present in an oft cited dictum in R v London Borough of Hillingdon, ex p Tinn (1988) 20 HLR 305 at p 308: “As a matter of common sense, it seems to me that it cannot be reasonable for a person to continue to occupy accommodation when they can no longer discharge their fiscal obligations in relation to that accommodation, that is to say, pay the rent and make the mortgage repayments, without so straining their resources as to… [read post]
We covered the different forms of content (long and short form posts, images, infographics, video, etc.) and where they work (and don't work), showed examples of effective and ineffective uses of social media, and talked about how to manage all of that content, whether you're just monitoring and listening or whether you're creating and distributing your own content. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
  But Justice Kennedy quickly interposed what sounded like an accusation:  “[Y]ou want us to say that we have sort of a coach class trustee,” such that “[w]e’re all traveling in coach class when we have an ESOP. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am by Fred Wertheimer
In voting in McCutcheon to strike the overall contribution limits, however, the five Justices including Justice Kennedy, eviscerated the solicitation prohibition the Court, including Justice Kennedy, voted to uphold in McConnell. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
 But the great drawback is that you’re stuck with your representative. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:54 am by Ronald Mann
Tons and tons of people have IRAs and they die every day, and then they’re inherited IRAs. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Here, Alice suggests that the case is very much about the ongoing viability of software patents: JUSTICE KENNEDY: You understand the government to say no software patents. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 It will be re-fixed for a later date. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Kagan wasn’t buying that argument: “I think … that’s probably because the Court has had a different understanding of what RFRA does and the kind of analysis that it requires courts to perform than you’re arguing for in this case. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel A. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am by Marty Lederman
The Supreme Court hears argument tomorrow morning in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In my last Justia column, I set out the extreme nature of the Religious Freedom restoration Act (RFRA). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]