Search for: "In Re MILLER "
Results 1961 - 1980
of 3,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
In the end, we’re all consumers. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Below we have presented some useful statistics that shed greater light on who's blogging, how much of it they're doing and other trends of law blogs today. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
With what’s left of Thanksgiving coming up, we are obligated as denizens of the Internet to do a post on things we’re thankful for. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:27 am
If you have, you’re in luck! [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:59 am
Miller v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
So, my point is that we’re on our own. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
I'm not — I don't think you're going to find it. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:56 am
In their 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
I understand you're in the D.C. area. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:32 am
Miller know what they’re in for: I swear to admit we’re broke, totally broke, and nothing but broke [City Comptroller Dan] Miller, who was elected independently of the mayor, argues that Chapter 9 would allow the city to shed at least some debt, the same way that bankrupt firms renegotiate terms with creditors. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 8:07 am
"We're much more careful here. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm
”Miller likewise affirmed the necessity of assisting formerly convicted persons with securing employment, citing the statistic that “easily half of [Philadelphia’s] population has someone within their relationships or family that’s a formerly convicted person. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:43 am
You’re just trying to make the inevitable easier. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 pm
Miller, 193 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
Miller and Hobbs present the same issue for juvenile homicide offenders. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:23 am
If you're looking for security, buy a dog. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
” These are not technically relists, but they’re worth brief comment anyway. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm
This was on the basis that the government was not a (interested) party to the proceedings and that, by reaching such a finding, the Court would make it difficult for the government to “re-open” this question and/or to challenge the reasoning in MGN v UK in a future case in Strasbourg [29]. (2a) Application of the rule in MGN v UK: Miller and Flood Proceeding on the basis that it would normally breach a publisher’s article 10 rights to require it to reimburse any… [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Most of the proposed measures are modest: plugging gaps in the law requiring waiting periods for gun purchases; re-enactment of the “assault weapons” ban; restrictions on very large ammunition magazines; and so forth. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
” (4 Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
