Search for: "Legal Writing Prof" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2008, 4:45 pm
But if they do not do so, they should be on notice that a few emails may result in major changes to a contract.As the article notes: The key issue arose under the New York Statute of Frauds, which requires the material terms of certain legally enforceable agreements to be memorialized in a writing signed by the parties to be charged (that is, the parties who will have to fulfill the responsibilities the agreement imposed). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz)   Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog),     Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills you will need to… [read post]
26 May 2008, 4:13 pm
   In addition, the really elite journals are unlikely to put a submission from the legal-research-and-writing person from Wyoming (see fn. 4) at the top of the pile, even at the risk of losing it. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:54 am by Shawn Nevers
 (Thanks to Legal Writing Prof Blog for the list.) [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:30 pm
Until her new appointment, she directed the school's programs in judicial studies and legal writing. **** Congratulations, Dean Simon! [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, 20-21 May: US ACI ‘In-house counsel forum on pharmaceutical antitrust’ – Maryland: (Orange Book Blog), 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New… [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:33 pm
Tell me:  what should new law profs hear about the legal scholarship landscape? [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:35 am
"If I could write a sentence in a circle at this point, instead of linearly as the language requires me to do, I would do so. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:06 pm
Writing in the NY Times on Tuesday, Adam Liptak reported that, as a result of analysis by GW Law Prof John Duffy, the courts may have to "undo thousands of patent decisions concerning claims worth billions of dollars. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:02 am
Paschetto, published in the February 2008 issue of The Practical Lawyer magazine Hat Tip: Legal Writing Prof Blog. [read post]
4 May 2008, 6:13 pm
  For more thoughts,  here's a link to a University of Arizona astronomy prof's restaurant review site which is informed and reliable. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:41 pm
Briefly, I'm an associate prof at Georgetown, where I teach the all too timely topics of bankruptcy and commercial law--lending and payments. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:17 am
" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Law Professors Law Prof Sues Students, Says They Defamed Him by Calling Him a Racist May 1, 2008, 05:47 am CDT Lawyer Pay Skadden, Wachtell Top AmLaw 100 May 1, 2008, 01:07 pm CDT Legal Ethics Lawyer Who Made Snarky Comments Ordered to Write Civility Article Apr 30, 2008, 06:12 am CDT Terrorism Mistakenly Revealed Logbook Has Lawyers Convinced They Are Monitored Apr 28,… [read post]
1 May 2008, 12:43 am
From Ray Ward at the (new) legal writer: Thanks to Legal Writing Prof Blog, I learned that the entire Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors is on-lineâ€â [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:37 pm
Wayne Schiess, the head of UT's legal-writing program and author of Wayne Schiess's legal-writing blog, spoke to the Austin Bar Association's Solo & Small Firm Section last week. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
  Michael Moore over at  Russell, Krafft & Gruber LLP writes about Employee Cell Phone Use:  Adopt a Policy on Talking, Texting, and E-mailing while Driving. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 11:55 am
'Rather, the missteps I have in mind are three and include: (1) my own misstep for writing in a previous Workplace Prof Blog post, before the decision, that a per se rule against this type of evidence would be adopted by the usual conservative Supreme Court Justice suspects; (2) the misstep made by the Supreme Court for granting certiorari in the first place in this rather mundane (legally speaking) employment discrimination case; and (3) the misstep of Professor… [read post]