Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 3,672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
That’s the conclusion of the United States Court of Appeals in upholding the FTC’s ruling. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
The Court said that for a U.S. court to have jurisdiction to hear these ATS claims, the claims must “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 623 (1984) ("Freedom of association ... plainly presupposes a freedom not to associate. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
Porteadores then challenged the commission's ability to take jurisdiction over it, since it was a foreign company and its corporate activities in the United States were governed by the North American Free Trade Agreement, not Arizona law. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
” At Corporate Counsel, Scott Gant and Christopher Hayes analyze last month’s decision in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
However, James Bond has yet to stop the decade-long battle between Omega S.A. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Wayne Long, 2014 FC 562 Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:08 am
§ 3730(b)(5), in United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
” Roberts argued that “the root issue here is entirely about money, and the King estate wants as much as it can get” and concludes that the deeper problem is that “copyright protection lasts for far, far too long. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Panasonic Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 11:03 pm
It would look like the United States allows Apple to get away with an unusual unwillingness to license SEPs.Ericsson tends to enforce its patents pretty aggressively in different parts of the world. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am
For this reason, and because it is from the United States’ highest court, wage and hour practitioners would be wise to read the entire decision. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
It has now been confirmed that two companies in the United States have potentially been the subject of cyber-terrorism. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
However, The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has subsequently had to decide on fundamental issues raised by patenting of embryo stem cells in Brüstle (see Katposts hereand here) and International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller (see Katpost here).The patenting of medicines leads to the ‘access to medicines’ debate (see Katpost here). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
