Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Resolving the conflict Mostyn J had taken the view in EBK v DLO (above) at [101] that “if a defendant in proceedings governed by FPR Part 37 or COPR Part 21 is found to have committed a contempt then that defendant must be named in open court and in general terms the court must state what is the nature of the contempt of court and what punishment, if any, has been imposed. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am by Robin Stewart
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm by CMS
This concept was described by Lord Briggs JSC in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 as promoting access to justice, as it allows solicitors to provide litigation services on credit to clients with strong cases who do not have the financial means to pay upfront. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2010).Richard Schragger, The Relative Irrelevance of the Establishment Clause, (Texas Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 583, 2011).Mary Szto, Strengthening the Rule of Virtue and Finding Chinese Law in 'Other' Places: Gods, Kin, Guilds, and Gifts, (February 21, 2011).Ryan Keith Bach, The Lord Giveth: Christian 'Health Insurance', the Role of State Insurance Regulation, and the Aftermath of Kentucky v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am by INFORRM
In Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946; [2005] EWCA Civ 75, Lord Phillips of Worth Matraver MR (pic) giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, found that a defamation claim could be struck out as an abuse of process if it did not disclose that “a real and substantial tort” had been committed within the jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
In a written judgment, the Lord Ordinary found the applicant's claims to be unfounded and unspecified.# The applicant appealed to the Inner House. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am by Michael Scutt
  An example of this was last year’s case of Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No 2) a case which involved British teachers employed by the British government to work in an international (not British) enclave. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A crowd question from what was apparently no less than a member of the House of Lords reminded us of the political charge of the Brexit debate (and enabled this foreigner to check off meeting a Lord from his London Visit To-Do List). [read post]