Search for: "M Baker"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 12:19 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Monica M. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Mark Baker said. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am
Bellinger III and Georgetown law professor Rita M. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Baker, 954 F.3d 351, 371 (1st Cir. 2020) (“The United States' system of representative democracy [includes] ... the Electoral College and ... [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
LANCE M. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Sex offenders are often under the spotlight of media attention and public scrutiny, however many of the preconceived notions surrounding sexual abuse appear to be based on misconceptions rather than empirical evidence (Center for Sex Offender Management, 2000; Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007; Levenson & D'Amora, 2007; Zgoba, 2004). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:25 pm
Articles: M. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:02 am
I’m thinking maybe they did not. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Atkins, Houston Jeffrey Alan Barnhill, Lufkin Julie Barry, Houston Kelly M. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:53 am
I'm not sure what this means exactly. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Beyer & James M. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Global Data Privacy: The EU Way, New York University Law Review, Vol. 94, 2019, Paul M. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:16 pm
I'm no expert, but I don't think it could be done. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
., Ann M. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:39 am
This reminds me of Baker & Emery’s, “When Every Relationship is Above Average,” 17 L. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Atkins, Houston Jeffrey Alan Barnhill, Lufkin Julie Barry, Houston Kelly M. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:41 pm
What I’m not so impressed with: multiple documents within the same browser tab. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
[The Supreme Court now has before it a case in which some very important copyright principles are at stake] The briefs have started to come in [see here], and the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument (date TBD), in the Google v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0340p.06 Drutis v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Baker J said that O’Flaherty J in the Supreme Court in Heaney (above) dealt with the right to silence as a corollary of freedom of expression “by reference to Article 40.3.1”, whereas he in fact dealt with it by reference to Article 40.6. [read post]
