Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
After their defeat in the 2015 election, the jury is still out as to whether the Harper decade was indeed transformational; for every commentator who claims Harper fundamentally changed Canada for good or ill, there is another who says his institutional and policy changes were piecemeal, incremental and easy to reverse. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 3:20 am
”To further its point that consumers would read Applicant’s mark as two separate words, the Board relied on Applicant’s own specimen of the mark displaying the letters “L” and the first “C” in larger font (see photo below). [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
  I will not consider here the good—the family ties, the bonds of language, the way we understand the world, and the relationship of people to each other. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
The law could revert to a state long ago rejected, and rejected for good reason. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:25 pm by D.ssa Sara Parrello
D.ssa Sara ParrelloIn BASIC NET SpA vs EUIPO, (case C-547/17 of Sept. 6, 2018), shortly after the recent Nestlè/Mondelez KIT KAT case (C‑84/17P, C-85/17 P and C-95/17 P; see ‘CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes’ in this blog), the CJEU again tackled the issue of how and where to prove acquired distinctiveness of EUTMs. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Whether or not America is ready for a vegan president, surely we are ready—indeed desperately in need of—a minimally decent one.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Mark Bennett
    5 Steps to 5 Minute Message   Your 5 minutes need to be more than an emotional/feel good story. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:31 am by Sascha Abrar
The plaintiff argued that the CJEU in Opel/Autec (case C-48/05) and the German Federal Supreme Court in Opel Blitz II (I ZR 88/08) had allegedly clarified that the manufacture and distribution of scale model cars bearing the trade marks of the original car manufacturers hardly ever constitute a trade mark infringement. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:17 am by Erik J. Heels
”https://kottke.org/18/09/the-web-design-museum * Suicide Is Not Funny, NAMI Can Help (2018-09-10) World Suicide Prevention Dayhttp://www.giantpeople.com/15689.html * The First Episode of ‘Late Night With Conan O’Brien’ (2018-09-13) “To mark the 25th anniversary of its airing, the very first episode of Late Night With Conan O’Brien has been made available online in its entirety. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
The KitKat trade mark (as reported in the CJEU decision- the photocopier has not been kind)By now, the fate of the four fingered KitKat shape mark is old news - Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P Rumours of the mark’s death have been greatly exaggerated - it is now for the EUIPO to reconsider the evidence in light of the CJEU's ruling and reach a decision as to whether or not the mark… [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:43 am by Peter Mahler
The majority also agreed with the siblings that the circumstances in Kemp concerning de facto dividends were distinguishable, stating that, “[c]ontrary to plaintiff’s contention, this is not a situation where the compensation policy was changed after the minority shareholder left the employ of the Corporation (cf. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” 2) CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes by Verena von Bomhard “On 25 July 2018, the CJEU handed down its ruling in the latest edition of the battle between Nestlé and Mondelez over the KIT KAT shape (C-84, 85, 95/17 P). [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 2) CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes by Verena von Bomhard “On 25 July 2018, the CJEU handed down its ruling in the latest edition of the battle between Nestlé and Mondelez over the KIT KAT shape (C-84, 85, 95/17 P). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]