Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 19,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2008, 5:06 pm
It marks the first execution in America since September 25, 2007 when the Supreme Court agreed to consider the constitutionality of lethal injection executions through the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 4:21 pm
In Community Credit Union Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Accordingly, a successful claim for passing off was established, and the defendant’s registration for the word mark BOCA BISTRO CAFÉ was held to be invalid. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:37 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Solohay, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:39 am
Jason Green v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:41 pm
The court’s opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal BoardTopics include:"tacking" - backward, forward; judge v. jury (Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
State Farm, 187 Cal. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:13 am
The state joins a growing list of GOP-led states that have embraced expanded postpartum Medicaid coverage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
” 492 U.S., at 51 (internal quotation marks omitted); see, e.g., Stern, 564 U.S., at 489–490; Oil States, 584 U.S., at 345. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
Today’s 7-2 opinion by Justice Thomas in Washington State Grange and Washington v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Already, LLC d/b/a YUMS v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:06 am
Speaking for the unanimous Court, Rothstein J. stated: “In order for the owner of a registered trade-mark to have exclusive use of the trade-mark throughout Canada, there cannot be a likelihood of confusion with another trade-mark anywhere in the country. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Mark D. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
