Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 1961 - 1980 of 6,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2007, 2:24 pm
Anyway, Demetri Martin, the great comedian who interviewed me about social network services for The Daily Show last year (video unavailable, of course), did a brilliant sendup of the conflict between Viacom and YouTube. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:00 am by My name
             Competition and innovation are key ideals in American society, and they were the main focus on March 5, 2014 when the CEOs of SpaceX and United Launch Alliance (“ULA”) testified before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.[1] The ULA, a joint venture between aerospace giants Boeing and Lockheed Martin, currently provides launch services for the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
On appeal to the Court of Appeal, Martin Howe QC on behalf of Viagogo submitted the new argument that to grant a Norwich Pharmacal order would represent a breach of the alleged wrongdoers’ personal data rights that was neither necessary nor proportionate. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
An action by LB Sullivan (pictured here), an elected Commissioner of the City of Montgomery, Alabama, against the New York Times, for defamation in an advertisement placed by the Committee to Defend Martin Luther King and the Struggle for Freedom in the South (element, above right), therefore failed. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:49 pm
  The issue was recently addressed by the Eleventh Circuit in Martin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:54 am by Mark Summerfield
The law in Australia regarding patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions was supposedly ‘settled’ in May 2016, when the High Court rejected an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia, thus leaving Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 as – for the moment, at least – the last word on… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
On the eve of the Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]