Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am by Dennis Crouch
§§ 2(b)(2)(A) (“The Office … may establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, which … shall govern the conduct of proceedings in the Office”). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am by David Pocklington
The S5(1) Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016 as enacted in March 2016 stated: “[a] relevant person must have due regard to guidance issued by the House of Bishops on matters relating to the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults”. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
David Booth Beers, began by representing the Presiding Bishop (originally, Bishop Griswold, and now Bishop Jefferts Schori). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:07 pm
Talk about hypocrisy -- but the members of the DBB (as well as David Booth Beers himself) are immersed in it up to their necks, day in and day out.Example #2: Bishop Ian Douglas of Connecticut has likewise "abandoned the communion of the Episcopal Church (USA)" by heading a diocese which has never acceded to the Canons of General Convention, but only to the Church's Constitution. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
See Rome Statute article 8(2)(b)(iv) (criminalizing attacks committed with the knowledge that harm to civilians would be “clearly excessive”). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:55 pm by Daniel Shaviro
  My co-convenor at the time was David Bradford.)Anyway, Nancy, unfortunately but understandably, had to leave early. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
I certainly hope you will.Sincerely,David Feige____________________Dear Mr. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
Whether the group members and the defenders are bound by agreements which are governed by Kenyan law and under which, properly construed under Kenyan law, the exclusive jurisdiction of the Kenyan courts in respect of the disputes articulated in these proceedings is prorogated; b. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm by Lucy Reed
Secondly there is David Burrows’ post: Forget Convention Rights in Private Children Proceedings. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But it doesn't matter to the conclusion. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
  There is a post about the case on the “Entertainment Law Matters” blog. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Stapleton, the court held that a pension plan maintained by a church-affiliated group qualifies for ERISA’s church plan exemption no matter who established the plan. [read post]