Search for: "New York v. New Jersey" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2006, 12:00 pm
They were joined by the cities of New York, Washington and Baltimore, and several environmental groups.The case, Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
There, plaintiff sued Merck (a New Jersey citizen) in New Jersey state court. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:08 pm
The little New Jersey district court case of OMS Investments v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Natalma M. McKnew
That triggered an action in the Southern District of New York, State of New York et al v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
NJ.com reports that Dr James Goydos, a former professor of surgery for Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, faces a 160-count indictment accusing him of photographing women in a bathroom, burglary and identity theft. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
New Jersey firms face competition from nearby New York firms, some of which boast a starting salary of $160,000. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Michael McCann
He asked the court to deny recognition and enforcement of the CAS award under article 5(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
The majority opinion, per Justice Kavanaugh, argues that Marshall was wrong in Worcester: In the early years of the Republic, the Federal Government sometimes treated Indian country as separate from state territory—in the same way that, for example, New Jersey is separate from New York. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
  Insufficient Diligence A second set of allegations lodged by New York argued that Lockton did not satisfy New York’s “diligent search” requirement before placing a policy in the excess-lines market. [read post]