Search for: "People v. Greene" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
”Furthermore, Canon v Green Cartridge [1997] AC 728 was considered to address one of the Judge at first instance’s concerns in the present case – the fact that if there was infringement Schütz would, as a commercial matter, have a monopoly in unpatented replacement bottles for their cages. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am by Richard M. Re
One important way of using signals is to green-light narrowing from below. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Partisan identification, he told Bondurant, is not the only thing on which people base their votes. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
“It’s ruthlessness that cows people. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Having weak links in the ranks is a bad idea, and washing people out is necessary. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
Will it be a state in which one ethnicity dominates another—the prospect that many people see in the recent passage by the Knesset of a new Basic Law on Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
By Amnesty International’s count, since 2001 over 500 people have died in the US as a result of Taser use. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
The upshot of this issue spread is that people who engage in wrongdoing in weapon development and testing could be held accountable. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]