Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 12,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Then there was consent to search the house. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
He's going to continue to do everything that he can to make sure that we protect people's freedoms. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
" People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:04 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:16 pm
In fact, the documents produced by the Defendant more or less acknowledge the capacity in the scheme to discriminate: their “Pre-implementation Equality Analysis” says that “disabled people are more than twice as likely to be unemployed as non-disabled people” and that there is “potential for people with disabilities to be disadvantaged within the process, particularly those with mental illness”. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:53 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:21 am
When members appear in public to protest censorship and what they view as corruption, they don a plastic mask of Guy Fawkes, the 17th-century Englishman who tried to blow up the Houses of Parliament. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:01 am
Superintendent (1962) and Mattz v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:25 pm
Circuit decided Trump v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:42 am
Grenci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:45 pm
How could a court order the government to provide people with houses while other people needed medical treatment? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:20 am
I only hire people I know, like and trust. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 8:37 pm
Amateur Youth Soccer Association v. [read post]
