Search for: "People v. Long" Results 1961 - 1980 of 19,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 8:35 pm
At least that means people in Australia will be able to use PVRs without the shackles imposed by the TV networks. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:32 am
In the nearly five months since the Supreme Court's Second Amendment opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Following the Conglomerate's excellent forum on Jones v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
More than 150 people known to be seeking restitution in the case of the USA v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:16 am by Buce
Abacus made it possible for more people to gamble on mortgages for no productive gain or loss. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:27 am by Dan Gauss
Personally, I think this whole spat may be good for equal marriage rights in the long run. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:48 am by Guest Blogger
Richard PrimusBruce Ackerman long ago persuaded me that Article V has not been the only route—or even the normal route—to legitimate constitutional change. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Alfred Brophy
He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm by Daniel Nazer and Parker Higgins
A federal appeals court sided with EFF yesterday on several of the major questions at issue in the long-running Lenz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am by Nick Hilborne, Litigation Futures
This judgment will give all people who work on factory sites additional protection in their working environment. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
People in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Azle, Springtown, Willow Park, Brock, Hudson Oaks, Millsap, Cool, Peaster, Palo Pinto, and other places in Parker and Palo Pinto Counties may wonder: How long does the insurance company have to pay the claim? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve long criticized the relevance of evaluating relative search result positioning in trademark analyses (see, e.g., my 2011 rant), but the court feels bound by the 2004 Playboy v. [read post]